[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110719173502.26fb2d55@bob.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:35:02 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: gregkh@...e.de, jirislaby@...il.com, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] TTY: remove tty_locked
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 14:35:14 +0200
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz> wrote:
> We used it really only serial and ami_serial. The rest of the
> callsites were BUG/WARN_ONs to check if BTM is held. Now that we
> pruned tty_locked from both of the real users, we can get rid of
> tty_lock along with __big_tty_mutex_owner.
All looks sensible to me for this series
(the uart wakeup one isn't new and its a different battle to fight)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists