[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E26032D.3070006@hp.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:20:29 -0600
From: Terry Loftin <terry.loftin@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Bob Montgomery <bob.montgomery@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: Fix "divide error: 0000" in find_busiest_group
On 07/19/2011 03:17 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 14:58 -0600, Terry Loftin wrote:
>> Correct the protection expression in update_cpu_power() to avoid setting
>> rq->cpu_power to zero.
>
> Firstly you fail to mention what kernel this is again, secondly this
> should never happen in the first place, so this fix is wrong. At best it
> papers over another bug.
My Apologies, this was found on kernel 2.6.32.32, but the all
the related code is the same in v3.0-rc7. The patch is against
v3.0-rc7. I've done some limited testing of this on 2.6.32.32
by modifying __cycles_2_ns() to add an offset to the TSC when
it is read to simulate 208 days of uptime, but that kernel has
only been running for a couple days.
I also agree this should never happen. As the statement currently
stands, it won't work - so it should either be corrected or removed.
Here is the alternative patch:
---
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index 0c26e2d..f9c9a89 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2549,9 +2549,6 @@ static void update_cpu_power(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
power *= scale_rt_power(cpu);
power >>= SCHED_LOAD_SHIFT;
- if (!power)
- power = 1;
-
cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_power = power;
sdg->cpu_power = power;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists