[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311114795.2617.10.camel@laptop>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:33:15 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Terry Loftin <terry.loftin@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Bob Montgomery <bob.montgomery@...com>,
John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: Fix "divide error: 0000" in
find_busiest_group
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 16:21 -0600, Terry Loftin wrote:
> > So you're running on a platform (unspecified) where we use a raw
> > sched_clock() that is buggy. Again, you're fixing symptoms not causes.
> >
> This x86_64. This is the actual cause, unless the rq->clock
> value should never roll, in which case, the clock roll is the
> actual cause and you can disregard these patches.
Its supposed to roll over on the full 64bit, and I think x86_64 only
suffers this if you have sched_clock_stable set to 1.
So I think the correct fix is disabling that logic for now. John Stultz
was working on some patches to fix __cycles_2_ns().
Something like the below perhaps.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 1edf5ba..dba0482 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ static void __cpuinit early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
- if (!check_tsc_unstable())
- sched_clock_stable = 1;
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists