[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201107200649.58956.edt@aei.ca>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:49:57 -0400
From: Ed Tomlinson <edt@....ca>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com, patches@...aro.org,
greearb@...delatech.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu/urgent 0/6] Fixes for RCU/scheduler/irq-threads trainwreck
On Wednesday 20 July 2011 00:44:35 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tuesday 19 July 2011 20:17:38 Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > Two things to add. Its possible an eariler error is missing from the log below. My serial console was missing
> > entries from before '0 and 40ish' and I did think I saw a bunch of FFFFFFFs scroll by eariler...
> >
> > Second, booting with threadirqs and boost enabled in .config with patches 2,5,6 is ok so far.
>
> Patches 3 and 4 resulted in failures? (Patch 1 certainly did.)
I tried with all 7 and got an unstable system. decided to add use the two I had already tested and
add one at a time. Things seem ok with 2 (fix boost). I've not tried with 2, 3,4,5,6. Given that you
have changed patch 1, I'll reboot with all 7 again.
Ed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists