[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107200852590.32737@router.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 08:54:10 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm-slab: allocate kmem_cache with __GFP_REPEAT
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> > > The changelog isn't that convincing, really. This is kmem_cache_create()
> > > so I'm surprised we'd ever get NULL here in practice. Does this fix some
> > > problem you're seeing? If this is really an issue, I'd blame the page
> > > allocator as GFP_KERNEL should just work.
> >
> > nf_conntrack creates separate slab-cache for each net-namespace,
> > this patch of course not eliminates the chance of failure, but makes it more
> > acceptable.
>
> I'm still surprised you are seeing failures. mm/slab.c hasn't changed
> significantly in a long time. Why hasn't anyone reported this before? I'd
> still be inclined to shift the blame to the page allocator... Mel, Christoph?
There was a lot of recent fiddling with the reclaim logic. Maybe some of
those changes caused the problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists