[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107200950270.1472@router.home>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:52:03 -0500 (CDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm-slab: allocate kmem_cache with __GFP_REPEAT
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Slab's kmem_cache is configured with an array of NR_CPUS which is the
> > maximum nr of cpus supported. Some distros support 4096 cpus in order to
> > accomodate SGI machines. That array then will have the size of 4096 * 8 =
> > 32k
>
> We currently support a dynamic schem for the possible nodes :
>
> cache_cache.buffer_size = offsetof(struct kmem_cache, nodelists) +
> nr_node_ids * sizeof(struct kmem_list3 *);
>
> We could have a similar trick to make the real size both depends on
> nr_node_ids and nr_cpu_ids.
>
> (struct kmem_cache)->array would become a pointer.
We should be making it a per cpu pointer like slub then. I looked at what
it would take to do so a couple of month ago but it was quite invasive.
The other solution is to use slub instead.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists