[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1311186383-24819-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:26:19 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, greearb@...delatech.com, edt@....ca,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 3/7] rcu: Streamline code produced by __rcu_read_unlock()
Given some common flag combinations, particularly -Os, gcc will inline
rcu_read_unlock_special() despite its being in an unlikely() clause.
Use noinline to prohibit this misoptimization.
In addition, move the second barrier() in __rcu_read_unlock() so that
it is not on the common-case code path. This will allow the compiler to
generate better code for the common-case path through __rcu_read_unlock().
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 12 ++++++------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 3a0ae03..4d2c068 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@ static struct list_head *rcu_next_node_entry(struct task_struct *t,
* notify RCU core processing or task having blocked during the RCU
* read-side critical section.
*/
-static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
+static noinline void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
{
int empty;
int empty_exp;
@@ -391,11 +391,11 @@ void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
struct task_struct *t = current;
barrier(); /* needed if we ever invoke rcu_read_unlock in rcutree.c */
- --t->rcu_read_lock_nesting;
- barrier(); /* decrement before load of ->rcu_read_unlock_special */
- if (t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0 &&
- unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
- rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
+ if (--t->rcu_read_lock_nesting == 0) {
+ barrier(); /* decr before ->rcu_read_unlock_special load */
+ if (unlikely(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special)))
+ rcu_read_unlock_special(t);
+ }
#ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING
WARN_ON_ONCE(ACCESS_ONCE(t->rcu_read_lock_nesting) < 0);
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING */
--
1.7.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists