linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fault-inject: make fault injection available for modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJ0pr19a9j-GBP4KveKqrjyZiqGNzoXd8S=-BWOtCv5nNrt5EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:50:31 +0200
From:	Per Forlin <per.forlin@...aro.org>
To:	J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Venkatraman S <svenkatr@...com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Sourav Poddar <sourav.poddar@...com>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] fault-inject: make fault injection available for modules

Hi James,

On 20 July 2011 01:44, J Freyensee <james_p_freyensee@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 02:31 PM, Per Forlin wrote:
>>
>> export symbols should_fail() and init_fault_attr_dentries() in order
>> to make modules use the fault injection functionality
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Per Forlin<per.forlin@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>  lib/fault-inject.c |    2 ++
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
>> index 7e65af7..cd28364 100644
>> --- a/lib/fault-inject.c
>> +++ b/lib/fault-inject.c
>> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ bool should_fail(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t
>> size)
>>
>>        return true;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(should_fail);
>
> Should this be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()?
>
I forgot to consider this. GPL is fine with me. I'll update.

>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS
>>
>> @@ -311,5 +312,6 @@ fail:
>>        cleanup_fault_attr_dentries(attr);
>>        return -ENOMEM;
>>  }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_fault_attr_dentries);
>
> and here too?
>
dito.

>>
>>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION_DEBUG_FS */
>
>
> --
> J (James/Jay) Freyensee
> Storage Technology Group
> Intel Corporation
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/