linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH]vmscan: add block plug for page reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEwNFnDj30Bipuxrfe9upD-OyuL4v21tLs0ayUKYUfye5TcGyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:53:16 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, mgorman@...e.de,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]vmscan: add block plug for page reclaim

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> per-task block plug can reduce block queue lock contention and increase request
> merge. Currently page reclaim doesn't support it. I originally thought page
> reclaim doesn't need it, because kswapd thread count is limited and file cache
> write is done at flusher mostly.
> When I test a workload with heavy swap in a 4-node machine, each CPU is doing
> direct page reclaim and swap. This causes block queue lock contention. In my
> test, without below patch, the CPU utilization is about 2% ~ 7%. With the
> patch, the CPU utilization is about 1% ~ 3%. Disk throughput isn't changed.

Why doesn't it enhance through?
It means merge is rare?

> This should improve normal kswapd write and file cache write too (increase
> request merge for example), but might not be so obvious as I explain above.

CPU utilization enhance on  4-node machine with heavy swap?
I think it isn't common situation.

And I don't want to add new stack usage if it doesn't have a benefit.
As you know, direct reclaim path has a stack overflow.
These days, Mel, Dave and Christoph try to remove write path in
reclaim for solving stack usage and enhance write performance.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/