| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87hb6hpbnz.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:02:40 +0200 From: David Kastrup <dak@....org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rc7-rt0 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes: > The overall patch size has shrunk significantly and the readability > (except for the missing changelogs in various patches) is at an > acceptable level. Well, thanks for all the work. I am actually already using per-irq threads and priorities on a 3.0-rc kernel (there is some boot option to enable them), and that helps for audio operation. It would be really great if realtime can move upstream completely eventually, and it looks like the current approach is a better match to the existing kernel, partly due to upstream improvements, partly through rewritten realtime code. The ongoing work seems very promising and seems to involve fewer compromises, boding well not just for the chances of getting merged upstream, but also of minimizing regressions compared to the non-realtime kernel. Thanks! -- David Kastrup -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists