[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110721105656.1d579b0b@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:56:56 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Eric Andersson <eric.andersson@...xphere.com>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhengguang.guo@...ch-sensortec.com,
stefan.nilsson@...xphere.com,
Albert Zhang <xu.zhang@...ch-sensortec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] input: add driver for Bosch Sensortec's BMA150
accelerometer
Only detail thing I see is this trivial one:
> +static int bma150_open(struct bma150_data *bma150)
> +{
> + int ret = bma150_set_mode(bma150->client, BMA150_MODE_NORMAL);
> + msleep(2);
> + return ret;
Does the msleep here need to be inside the mutex lock for the IRQ
case ?
Otherwise it looks good except that the lack of runtime pm means it'll
stop the rest of the bus heirarchy from suspending and breaks
suspend/resume on runtime_pm based systems. I think we still need runtime
pm taking the pm reference on the input open dropping it on the close and
that's about it ? That will be sufficient to let the i2c bus controller
also runtime suspend/resume.
Not so sure about the sysfs drop - but I think its probably the right
thing for upstream and any long term 'we need a fancy driver' would be
via IIO which would sort all the interface problems.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists