[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110721191250.1c945740.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:12:50 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg: do not try to drain per-cpu caches without
pages
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:38:00 +0200
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> wrote:
> drain_all_stock_async tries to optimize a work to be done on the work
> queue by excluding any work for the current CPU because it assumes that
> the context we are called from already tried to charge from that cache
> and it's failed so it must be empty already.
> While the assumption is correct we can do it by checking the current
> number of pages in the cache. This will also reduce a work on other CPUs
> with an empty stock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
At the first look, when a charge against TransParentHugepage() goes
into the reclaim routine, stock->nr_pages != 0 and this will
call additional kworker.
nr_pages check itself seems good.
Thanks,
-Kame
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 14 ++------------
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index f11f198..786bffb 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2140,7 +2140,7 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *mem, unsigned int nr_pages)
> */
> static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
> {
> - int cpu, curcpu;
> + int cpu;
> /*
> * If someone calls draining, avoid adding more kworker runs.
> */
> @@ -2148,22 +2148,12 @@ static void drain_all_stock_async(struct mem_cgroup *root_mem)
> return;
> /* Notify other cpus that system-wide "drain" is running */
> get_online_cpus();
> - /*
> - * Get a hint for avoiding draining charges on the current cpu,
> - * which must be exhausted by our charging. It is not required that
> - * this be a precise check, so we use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of
> - * getcpu()/putcpu().
> - */
> - curcpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
> for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
>
> - if (cpu == curcpu)
> - continue;
> -
> mem = stock->cached;
> - if (!mem)
> + if (!mem || !stock->nr_pages)
> continue;
> if (mem != root_mem) {
> if (!root_mem->use_hierarchy)
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists