lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2011 13:13:58 +0200
From:	Olaf Hering <olaf@...fle.de>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: purpose of WARN_ON in kernel/workqueue.c:worker_enter_idle()

On Thu, Jul 21, Tejun Heo wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 06:15:18PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > whats the purpose of "WARNING: at kernel/workqueue.c:1217 worker_enter_idle()"?
> > I put some debug in the function, cpu is always 1, nr_workers is either
> > 2 or 3, current_work is NULL.
> > Is there some real bug lurking thats worth to track down?
> 
> Oh yeah, that means workqueue worker accounting went out of sync which
> may lead to workqueue hang which usually means dead system.  Can you
> please print out what goes out of sync?  ie. print gcwq->nr_workers,
> nr_idle and get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu)?

Whit my silly debug patch below I got this output, which is also in the
posted dmesg output:

[   43.376143] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[  821.936288] worker_enter_idle: c 1 2           (null)
[ 1068.816239] worker_enter_idle: c 1 2           (null)
[ 1167.136160] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 1220.896745] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 1280.176207] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 1304.820106] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 2091.140542] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 2275.856762] worker_enter_idle: c 1 3           (null)
[ 2382.976445] worker_enter_idle: c 1 2           (null)
[ 2387.696067] worker_enter_idle: c 1 2           (null)


> Also, it would be helpful to enable and record workqueue events (grep
> workqueue /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/available_events).  It should
> allow us what led to the condition.

I will enable these options and report back.


---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1192,6 +1192,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(queue_delayed_work_on)
 static void worker_enter_idle(struct worker *worker)
 {
 	struct global_cwq *gcwq = worker->gcwq;
+	int cpu;
 
 	BUG_ON(worker->flags & WORKER_IDLE);
 	BUG_ON(!list_empty(&worker->entry) &&
@@ -1213,8 +1214,23 @@ static void worker_enter_idle(struct wor
 		wake_up_all(&gcwq->trustee_wait);
 
 	/* sanity check nr_running */
+#if 0
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(gcwq->nr_workers == gcwq->nr_idle &&
 		     atomic_read(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu)));
+#else
+	cpu = atomic_read(get_gcwq_nr_running(gcwq->cpu));
+	if (gcwq->nr_workers == gcwq->nr_idle && cpu) {
+		void *func;
+		struct work_struct *cw = worker->current_work;
+		func = cw ? cw->func : NULL;
+		printk("%s: c %x %x %p", __func__, cpu, gcwq->nr_workers, func);
+		if (func)
+			print_symbol("%s\n",(unsigned long)func);
+		else
+			printk("\n");
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+	}
+#endif
 }
 
 /**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ