lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:27:37 -0500 (CDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
cc:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm-slab: allocate kmem_cache with __GFP_REPEAT



On Thu, 21 Jul 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:

> Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 09:52 -0500, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>
> > We should be making it a per cpu pointer like slub then. I looked at what
> > it would take to do so a couple of month ago but it was quite invasive.
> >
>
> I took a look at this too, but using percpu data would consume more
> memory, because percpu allocator allocates memory blobs for all possible
> cpus, while current code handles online/offline cpu nicely.

The number of possible cpus is determined on bootup. If the BIOS provides
the right information about which cpus are present and if there is no
hotswapping of cpus possible then only per cpu areas for the actual
functioning cpus are allocated. Certainly no desktop bios will indicate
that 4096 cpus are possible.



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ