[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110721211610.GE24324@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 18:16:10 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support to install perf python
extension
Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:41:50PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 04:04:07PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 08:47:15PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > nope, I added install-python_ext since it installs to the
> > > python system lib area, and it could break standard install
> > But where is that it picks the binaries built? The problem I was
> > experiencing was that it wasn't obeying O=, just using the source dir
> I haven't checked the 'O=' that much.. will do :)
> > as the build dir, effectively building it again, in a different place.
> I dont have that much experince with python, but here's what I found:
> (might be missing something..)
<SNIP>
> Also there might be a way to overload distutils class and put our
> specific options to this new class..
> As I checked some of python extension packages, some of them
> do not use distutils at all.. can't imagine why ;)
Ok, we're on the same page with that ';)' ;)
I'd love to use what is 'pythonic', i.e. whatever the python people
think we should use and don't bother with all the module
build/install details, but since we want to have O= working...
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists