[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107202019420.26781@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:29:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
To: axboe@...nel.dk, "Alasdair G. Kergon" <agk@...hat.com>
cc: dm-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] backing-dev: use synchronize_rcu_expedited instead of
synchronize_rcu
Hi Jens
Please would you consider taking this into the block tree? It seems to
speed up device deletion enormously.
Mikulas
---
backing-dev: use synchronize_rcu_expedited instead of synchronize_rcu
synchronize_rcu sleeps several timer ticks. synchronize_rcu_expedited is
much faster.
With 100Hz timer frequency, when we remove 10000 block devices with
"dmsetup remove_all" command, it takes 27 minutes. With this patch,
removing 10000 block devices takes only 15 seconds.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
---
mm/backing-dev.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-3.0-rc7-fast/mm/backing-dev.c
===================================================================
--- linux-3.0-rc7-fast.orig/mm/backing-dev.c 2011-07-19 18:01:00.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-3.0-rc7-fast/mm/backing-dev.c 2011-07-19 18:01:07.000000000 +0200
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@ static void bdi_remove_from_list(struct
list_del_rcu(&bdi->bdi_list);
spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
- synchronize_rcu();
+ synchronize_rcu_expedited();
}
int bdi_register(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, struct device *parent,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists