linux-kernel - Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110722141241.GA22886@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 22:12:41 +0800
From:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To:	Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>
Cc:	penberg@...nel.org, chris@...is-wilson.co.uk, luke@...hjr.org,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, rjw@...k.pl, ray-lk@...rabbit.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	florian@...kler.org, keithp@...thp.com
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?

Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru> wrote:
> 
>    Or would it be more fair to say that UMS is not supported anymore,
>    is broken and just remove support for it?

It's kind of ironic that the intention of the offending patch
was to avoid a UMS crash :)

Anyway I'm now using KMS (forced to due to new hardware) so I
certainly don't have any objections to reverting this patch.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/