linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] asm-generic: delay.h fix udelay and ndelay for 8 bit args

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1311361492.2660.13.camel@localhost>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:04:52 +0200
From:	Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
To:	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] asm-generic: delay.h fix udelay and ndelay for 8
 bit args


On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 16:05 +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> 
> With a non-constant 8-bit argument, a call to udelay() generates a warning:
> 
<snip>

> ---
> 
> Here's a patch that should resolve the merge conflict.  This applies
> Andrew's changes on top of the new asm-generic/delay.h instead of the x86
> arch-specific one.  I've tested this for OpenRISC and the changed macros
> don't cause any problems there.
> 
> Let me know if this is OK and I'll throw it into the OpenRISC tree together
> with the other delay.h modifications.
> 

I haven't gotten any feedback on this... since the change looks
appropriate to merge with the other changes to asm-generic/delay.h, I'll
apply this patch there and carry the patch together with the other
asm-generic/delay.h changes in the 'openrisc' tree.  Andrew can drop the
patch from his series to avoid the merge conflict.

I hope that works for everybody...

Thanks,
Jonas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/