[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110722133220.0baf2199@nehalam.ftrdhcpuser.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:32:20 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David <david@...olicited.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0 release
This a regression which probably began with
commit e22bee782b3b00bd4534ae9b1c5fb2e8e6573c5c
Author: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Date: Tue Jun 29 10:07:14 2010 +0200
workqueue: implement concurrency managed dynamic worker pool
Before that it was perfectly legal for link watch code to
call schedule_delayed_work from IRQ. This should be allowable;
the code to manage the worker pool should handle it.
Network devices call netif_carrier_on/off from IRQ all the
time. The problem is that the new pool code breaks this
if link watch tries to schedule work before there enough worker
threads.
The workqueue code should have a fallback and not try and
do anything if being called from IRQ.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists