linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in rtc_irq_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110722150432.2370bcf2.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:04:32 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in rtc_irq_set_state()

On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:50 -0000
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:

> The code checks the correctness of the parameters, but unconditionally
> arms/disarms the hrtimer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org

The -stable maintainers will want to know why they should merge this.

The maintainers of other trees will wonder whether they should backport
it too.

To help them make these decision we should always provide a description
of the user-visible effects of the bug, please.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/