linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf script: add magic word to indicate the failure of resolving symbols

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E28FBC2.7040208@hitachi.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:25:38 +0900
From:	Akihiro Nagai <akihiro.nagai.hw@...achi.com>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v2 2/6] perf script: add magic word to indicate the
 failure of resolving symbols

(2011/07/21 23:39), David Ahern wrote:
> On 07/21/2011 03:36 AM, Akihiro Nagai wrote
>>> Evidently I had the shift key down -- s/{}/[]/.  :-) And I see now, for
>>> dsoname you have [unknown] and for symname (unknown). Use the same for
>>> both. Since () is already used for separating dsoname, use [unknown] for
>>> both
>> At print_sample_start() in builtin-script.c, there is the code that
>> print "(unknown)"
>> when perf cannnot resolve the event name.
>>
>>      printf("%s: ", evname ? evname : "(unknown)");
>>
>> On the other hand, at hist_entry__dso_snprintf() in util/sort.c, there
>> is the code
>> prints "[unknown]" for unresolvable DSO name.
>>
>>      return repsep_snprintf(bf, size, "%-*s", width, "[unknown]");
>>
>> In addition, perf uses "[]" for DSO name for example "[kernel.kallsyms]".
>> So, I chose it. However, this specification is not easy for user-scripts.
>> Should I unify this expression?
>
> That was my thought -- to use the same for both dso and sym if it is
> unknown. And since DSO names are wrapped in () use "[unknown]" for both
> -- ie., right now the format is  "symname (dsoname)" (though kernel syms
> from kallsyms come out as "symname ([kernel.kallsyms])"). With an
> unknown it will be "[unknown] (dsoname)" or "[unknown] ([unknown])"
> which retains the number of fields in a uniquely parse-able way.
I agree.
In the next patch set, I'd like to unify the all expressions to "[unknown]".

Thank you.
>
> David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/