[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110722160127.ec061ab6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:01:27 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] um: Set __HAVE_ARCH_GATE_AREA for x86_64
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:18:31 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at> wrote:
> Implement arch_vma_name() and make get_gate_vma(),
> in_gate_area() and in_gate_area_no_mm() a nop.
>
> We need arch_vma_name() to support vDSO.
Well this is awkward.
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h | 1 +
> arch/um/sys-x86_64/mem.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Your um-clean-up-vm-flagsh.patch deleted arch/um/sys-x86_64/mem.c.
There's not really any appropriate .c file in arch/um/sys-x86_64 for
these functions so I changed the patch to reinstate mem.c.
Then I changed my maind and dropped it ;) Hopefully none of the other
patches depended on this one.
Then I looked at um-implement-a-x86_64-vdso.patch, got nervous and
undropped um-set-__have_arch_gate_area-for-x86_64.patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists