[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110723132411.GA22183@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:24:11 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>, npiggin@...nel.dk,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] VFS : mount lock scalability for files systems without
mount point (WAS vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box)
I think you actually want this done in kern_mount_data, as both
ipc and proc want long-term references as well. I also suspect with
additional creep of container awareness more internal mounts will switch
to kern_mount_data. Al, what do you think about simply passing the
private data argument to kern_mount and kill kern_mount_data? It's not
like the additional argument is going to cause us any pain.
> +struct vfsmount *kern_mount(struct file_system_type *type)
> +{
> + struct vfsmount *mnt;
> +
> + mnt = kern_mount_data(type, NULL);
> + if (!IS_ERR(mnt)) {
> + /* it is a longterm mount, don't release mnt until */
> + /* we unmount before file sys is unregistered */
Please use normal kernel comment style, e.g.
/*
* This is a longterm mount, don't release mnt until we umount
* it just before unregister_filesystem().
*/
Adding proper kerneldoc comments for the kern_mount/umount function that
explain things in more detail would also be nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists