[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110723144346.GA5946@localhost>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 22:43:46 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the writeback tree with the vfs
tree
Hi Stephen,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:29:44PM +0800, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Wu,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the writeback tree got a conflict in
> mm/filemap.c between commit ba96a361e21b ("fs: kill i_alloc_sem") from
> the vfs tree and commit f758eeabeb96 ("writeback: split
> inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock") from the writeback tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
OK, thank you very much!
Cheers,
Fengguang
> diff --cc mm/filemap.c
> index f820e60,1e492c3..0000000
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@@ -78,7 -78,10 +78,7 @@@
> * ->i_mutex (generic_file_buffered_write)
> * ->mmap_sem (fault_in_pages_readable->do_page_fault)
> *
> - * inode_wb_list_lock
> - * ->i_mutex
> - * ->i_alloc_sem (various)
> - *
> + * bdi->wb.list_lock
> * sb_lock (fs/fs-writeback.c)
> * ->mapping->tree_lock (__sync_single_inode)
> *
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists