[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1107231847520.4843@tiger>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 18:55:48 +0300 (EEST)
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>
cc: Kirill Smelkov <kirr@....spb.ru>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Luke-Jr <luke@...hjr.org>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored?
Hi Keith,
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Keith Packard wrote:
>> Sorry, to me it all looked like "UMS is being ignored forever".
>
> You're right, of course -- UMS is a huge wart on the kernel driver at
> this point, keeping it working while also adding new functionality
> continues to cause challenges. We tend to expect that most people will
> run reasonably contemporaneous kernel and user space code, and so three
> years after the switch, it continues to surprise us when someone
> actually tries UMS.
I know I sound like a broken record but I really wish you i915 devs were
little more eager to revert broken patches early rather than late. I mean,
this particular breakage was already bisected but nobody said or
did anything - and it's not like it's the first time either!
I suppose I need to bribe Linus somehow to be more strict with you folks.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists