linux-kernel - Re: [git pull] vfs and fs patches for 3.1, part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110723012712.GG31405@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:27:12 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs and fs patches for 3.1, part 1

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:54:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> *Most*, but not all, of the commits you list seem to exist in the
> for-next branch.

The rest is a build fix from Randy + obvious ERR_CAST-instead-of-cast +
isofs lock removal + a couple of IN_DELETE_SELF fixes that should've gone
in last cycle...
 
> Which is identical to the "untested" branch, so that, together with
> the "not everything listed in your shortlog is there" makes me not get
> the warm and fuzzies.

#untested == #master in my local tree, no more than that...  My apologies
about the forgotten push.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/