[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1107230907440.2702@ionos>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:15:54 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] rtc: Handle errors correctly in
rtc_irq_set_state()
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:12:50 -0000
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > The code checks the correctness of the parameters, but unconditionally
> > arms/disarms the hrtimer.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > Cc: stable@...nel.org
>
> The -stable maintainers will want to know why they should merge this.
>
> The maintainers of other trees will wonder whether they should backport
> it too.
>
> To help them make these decision we should always provide a description
> of the user-visible effects of the bug, please.
Fair enough.
The result is that a random task might arm/disarm rtc timer and
surprise the real owner by either generating events or by stopping
them. Both undesired behaviour :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists