linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net: allow netif_carrier to be called safely from IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110722.171642.1498051921735569337.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jul 2011 17:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shemminger@...tta.com
Cc:	romieu@...zoreil.com, greearb@...delatech.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, david@...olicited.net,
	tj@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: allow netif_carrier to be called safely from IRQ

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 15:53:56 -0700

> As reported by Ben Greer and Froncois Romieu. The code path in 
> the netif_carrier code leads it to try and disable
> a late workqueue to reenable it immediately
> netif_carrier_on
> -> linkwatch_fire_event
>    -> linkwatch_schedule_work
>       -> cancel_delayed_work
>          -> del_timer_sync  
> 
> If __cancel_delayed_work is used instead then there is no
> problem of waiting for running linkwatch_event.
> 
> There is a race between linkwatch_event running re-scheduling
> but it is harmless to schedule an extra scan of the linkwatch queue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>

Applied.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/