[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110724221619.GM16487@ics.muni.cz>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 00:16:19 +0200
From: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@....muni.cz>
To: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@...jp.nec.com>, agk@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: request baset device mapper in Linux
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 04:28:06PM +0900, Jun'ichi Nomura wrote:
> How fast is the single disk performance?
about 120MB/s if I run dd on a single disk only.
> Could you check /proc/interrupts and /proc/softirqs and
> see how they are distributed among CPUs?
I don't see anything strange except function call interrupts hit single CPU
(that ksoftirqd).
> As for the memory usage, what happens if you add 'iflag=direct' to dd?
then ksoftirqd does not eat significant amount of CPU.
> Also, is it possible for you to try the attached patch?
> I would like to know whether it changes the phenomenon you see.
> This patch should reduce the number of calls to recalc segments.
> If it is the root cause, the patch should fix your case.
> The patch is generated for 3.0 but should be easily applicable to
> other version of request-based dm.
the patch fixed the problem. I didn't test whether it broke something else or
not, though.
> As Kiyoshi suggested, it is important to know whether this
> problem occurs with the latest kernel.
> So if you could try 3.0, it would be very helpful.
so, do I need to check recent kernel as the patch works for me?
--
Lukáš Hejtmánek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists