[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110724105119.GP2622@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:51:19 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip:x86/memblock RFC] SuperH: Use HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
sh doesn't access early_node_map[] directly and enabling
HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is trivial - replacing add_active_range() calls
with memblock_set_node() and selecting HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is
enough.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
---
Paul, memblock now can carry node information itself without relying
on early_node_map[], which makes operations which make use of both
information much saner and generally makes NUMA memory init simpler.
For more details, please read the following thread.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.cross-arch/10354
I couldn't get the cross-compiler from korg to build configuration
with CPU w/ NUMA support but given the trivial nature of the change, I
don't think it would cause build failures on different configs, but
this definitely needs testing on actual NUMA configuration.
The patches implementing HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is currently in
tip:x86/memblock branch on which this patch is based on.
Thanks.
arch/sh/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/sh/kernel/setup.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: work/arch/sh/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/sh/Kconfig
+++ work/arch/sh/Kconfig
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ config SUPERH
select CLKDEV_LOOKUP
select HAVE_IDE if HAS_IOPORT
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK
+ select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
select HAVE_OPROFILE
select HAVE_GENERIC_DMA_COHERENT
select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK
Index: work/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
===================================================================
--- work.orig/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
+++ work/arch/sh/kernel/setup.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ void __init __add_active_range(unsigned
pmb_bolt_mapping((unsigned long)__va(start), start, end - start,
PAGE_KERNEL);
- add_active_range(nid, start_pfn, end_pfn);
+ memblock_set_node(PFN_PHYS(start_pfn),
+ PFN_PHYS(end_pfn - start_pfn), nid);
}
void __init __weak plat_early_device_setup(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists