[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110724115752.GA11048@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 07:57:52 -0400
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...hat.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix wrong return value of xfs_file_aio_write
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 01:54:20PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> On 2011.07.24 at 07:16 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:02:12AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> > > The following patch fixes the problem for me:
> >
> > Good catch, can you send it with a proper signoff and description?
>
> The fsync prototype change commit 02c24a82187d accidentally overwrote
> the ssize_t return value of xfs_file_aio_write with 0 for SYNC type
> writes. Fix this by checking if an error occured when calling
> xfs_file_fsync and only change the return value in this case.
> In addition xfs_file_fsync actually returns a normal negative error, so
> fix this, too.
> ---
> fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_file.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
The Signed-off-by: line is still missing, and you normally shouldn't
quote the previous mail you reply to for patches. Sorry for beeing
nit-picky, but see this as a training exercise :)
You can also add:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Tested-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
as I've run this through xfsqa (strictly speaking it's still running,
but it looks good so far)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists