linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <AB20F4B6-2A48-4245-9652-E1AE33C7DD29@suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:46:42 +0200
From:	Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
	asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1


On 25.07.2011, at 11:41, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>>> Virtualization is very tightly bound to the kernel, like it or 
>>> not. So is profiling, power management and a few other things.
> 
> It's a very simple point and observation: tools which integrate to 
> the kernel so that they wouldnt even run on another kernel obviously 
> are very natural to develop in tools/.

Ah, very good. So all we need to do to prove the point that kvm-tool doesn't belong in tools/ is port KVM to another OS and make kvm-tool compile there too? Shouldn't be too hard. People already have working ports of (old) KVM versions on FreeBSD and Windows.


Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/