[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110725123636.GA28530@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:36:37 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
emunson@...bm.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amodra@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix symbol resolution on old ppc64 ABI
* Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org> wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> > > It would cover most cases. There would be an issue with
> > > functions that are less than 24 bytes in length (ie 6
> > > instructions). Tiny functions are probably rare enough that we
> > > can live with it.
> >
> > Do such tiny functions get packed tightly, below 24 bytes?
> > Another sanitization pass could solve that issue, to trim
> > partially overlapping symbol regions, right?
>
> That would work I think. Should I cook up a patch?
Yeah, would be nice - if Arnaldo agrees with the approach too.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists