[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311598300.10256.10.camel@lappy>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:51:40 +0300
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
gorcunov@...il.com, asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/25/2011 03:45 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf<agraf@...e.de> wrote:
> > >> And don't get this the wrong way either, I'm not hostile against other
> > >> operating systems, but I simply am not interested enough in them to
> > >> spend my time improving them.
> > >
> > > Then kvm-tool is about as useful as Mac-on-Linux. Why don't we have MoL user land in the kernel? I even added support for KVM to it about a year ago. So all I need to do is change it to the kernel coding style, add some dependencies on kernel headers and I'm good for a pull request?
> >
> > Oh, I dunno - have you tried that? If you're interested in sending a
> > patch against tools/kvm that adds KVM-based support to Mac, I'm happy
> > to review it and consider for inclusion. ;-)
>
> The patch will be a lot bigger than tools/kvm itself.
>
But it would be as a single patch series which includes kvm and
tools/kvm :)
--
Sasha.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists