[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311599640.3064.0.camel@fedora>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:14:00 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] kbuild: export MAKECMDGOALS
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 16:07 +0200, Michal Marek wrote:
> On 18.7.2011 21:05, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Arnaud Lacombe<lacombar@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Cc: Steven Rostedt<srostedt@...hat.com>
> >> ---
> >> Makefile | 3 +++
> >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> >> index afb8e0d..ea517fd 100644
> >> --- a/Makefile
> >> +++ b/Makefile
> >> @@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ LC_COLLATE=C
> >> LC_NUMERIC=C
> >> export LC_COLLATE LC_NUMERIC
> >>
> >> +# Export make goals
> >> +export MAKECMDGOALS
> >> +
> >> # We are using a recursive build, so we need to do a little thinking
> >> # to get the ordering right.
> >> #
> > Michal, before I send a new version of this serie, can you tell me
> > your point of view on the export of MAKECMDGOALS (or
> > KBUILD_MAKECMDGOALS) and Kconfig to the environment ?
>
> A cleaner interface would IMO be to check the target in the makefile and
> pass a commandline option to streamline_config.pl, so that it's easier
> to run it manually.
I agree with this. As I've been told by many people that they prefer to
run streamline_config.pl directly.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists