[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1311611311.24752.5.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 18:28:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/18] CFS Bandwidth Control v7.2
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 09:21 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 05:00:41PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 16:58 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > + rcu_read_lock();
> > > + ret = walk_tg_tree_from(tg, tg_set_cfs_period_down, NULL, &period);
> > > + rcu_read_unlock();
> >
> > rcu over a mutex doesn't really work in mainline, bah..
>
> SRCU can handle that situation, FWIW. But yes, blocking in an RCU
> read-side critical section is a no-no.
Yeah, I know, but didn't notice until after I sent.. SRCU isn't useful
though, way too slow due to lacking srcu_call().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists