linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110725132022.9cac27e6aee69728e4de6b97@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:20:22 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs tree

Hi all,

On Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:44:04 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the vfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> 
> fs/nfs/read.c: In function 'nfs_do_read':
> fs/nfs/read.c:246:42: error: 'struct nfs_open_context' has no member named 'path'
> 
> Caused by commit 6e4efd568574 ("NFS: Clean up nfs_read_rpcsetup and
> nfs_write_rpcsetup") from the nfs tree interacting with commit
> b98aad31afdc ("nfs_open_context doesn't need struct path either").
> 
> I have applied the following merge fixup patch:

This patch (repeasted here) is now required after mergeing the nfs tree
and Linus' tree:

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2011 16:32:06 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] vfs/nfs: fixup for nfs_open_context change

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 fs/nfs/read.c |    2 +-
 fs/nfs/write.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/read.c b/fs/nfs/read.c
index 3170712..2171c04 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/read.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/read.c
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static void nfs_read_rpcsetup(struct nfs_page *req, struct nfs_read_data *data,
 static int nfs_do_read(struct nfs_read_data *data,
 		const struct rpc_call_ops *call_ops)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = data->args.context->path.dentry->d_inode;
+	struct inode *inode = data->args.context->dentry->d_inode;
 
 	return nfs_initiate_read(data, NFS_CLIENT(inode), call_ops);
 }
diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
index 2d2c773..ebed518 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/write.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ static int nfs_do_write(struct nfs_write_data *data,
 		const struct rpc_call_ops *call_ops,
 		int how)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = data->args.context->path.dentry->d_inode;
+	struct inode *inode = data->args.context->dentry->d_inode;
 
 	return nfs_initiate_write(data, NFS_CLIENT(inode), call_ops, how);
 }
-- 
1.7.5.4

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/