lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110724232721.GA19839@bloggs.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 09:27:21 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: perf PPC: kernel panic with callchains and context switch events

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 03:57:51PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> I am hoping someone familiar with PPC can help understand a panic that
> is generated when capturing callchains with context switch events.
> 
> Call trace is below. The short of it is that walking the callchain
> generates a page fault. To handle the page fault the mmap_sem is needed,
> but it is currently held by setup_arg_pages. setup_arg_pages calls
> shift_arg_pages with the mmap_sem held. shift_arg_pages then calls
> move_page_tables which has a cond_resched at the top of its for loop. If
> the cond_resched() is removed from move_page_tables everything works
> beautifully - no panics.
> 
> So, the question: is it normal for walking the stack to trigger a page
> fault on PPC? The panic is not seen on x86 based systems.

Walking the user stack can certainly generate a page fault; walking
the kernel stack should never generate a page fault.  If any page
fault is generated reading the user stack frame, we're supposed to
detect that and fall back to walking the page tables manually (see
read_user_stack_64() in arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_callchain.c).  I
think I need to check our __get_user_inatomic() implementation.

I don't think removing the cond_resched() from move_page_tables is the
right answer.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ