[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACqU3MW3+Ph9GgL0b4y+RZ2Ak99XxNuNqzayuXXwVCFs8=ijxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 16:28:33 -0400
From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: stufever@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wang Shaoyan <wangshaoyan.pt@...bao.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TRACING: Fix a copmile warning
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:19 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 15:43 -0400, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>
>> Actually, we have a special uninitialized_var(x) macro to handle such
>> false positive. From include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:
>>
>> /*
>> * A trick to suppress uninitialized variable warning without generating any
>> * code
>> */
>> #define uninitialized_var(x) x = x
>
> I'm aware of that too, but I think that is inappropriate as well. As I
> said, some versions of gcc report it, others don't. Seems that gcc 4.6.0
> says this is an error where 4.5.1 does not (I just tried both). Looks to
> me like a regression in gcc. Why not fix it there?
>
It should, but gcc 4.6.x has already been shipped out there, so we
will have to live with that for a while. Marking this as a false
positive now will avoid having multiple submission for this in the
future.
- Arnaud
> -- Steve
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists