linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: add slave config operation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E2DDC33.3020107@atmel.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 23:12:19 +0200
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vkoul@...radead.org>
CC:	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dmaengine: at_hdmac: add slave config operation

On 07/07/2011 04:33 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 13:17 +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Only change source/destination peripheral register access width.
> How about a little more explainable change log
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
>> ---
>>   drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> index 7096adb..9cb8044 100644
>> --- a/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/dma/at_hdmac.c
>> @@ -954,6 +954,35 @@ static int atc_control(struct dma_chan *chan, enum dma_ctrl_cmd cmd,
>>   		clear_bit(ATC_IS_PAUSED,&atchan->status);
>>
>>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&atchan->lock, flags);
>> +	} else if (cmd == DMA_SLAVE_CONFIG) {
>> +		struct dma_slave_config *dmaengine_cfg = (void *)arg;
>> +		struct at_dma_slave	*atslave = chan->private;
> This API was created to remove chan->private, so this doesn't make sense
> at all. If your intent is to have a channels internal data, then you
> should consider embedding dma_chan into this structure (the way other
> dma drivers do) rather than using private field.

Yes, I need to rework this slave config part of the driver (and its 
related calling drivers).

So please drop this 3/3 patch of the series.

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/