lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E2DEC1A.5070109@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:20:10 -0700
From:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC:	Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3



On 07/24/2011 09:12 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:

...

>> Also not sure where this one came from:
>> [   37.456688] BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, threaded-ml/1619
>> [   37.456690]  lock: ffff8801fdc74d50, .magic: 00000000, .owner: <none>/-1, .owner_cpu: 0
>> [   37.456692] Pid: 1619, comm: threaded-ml Tainted: G         C  3.0.0-rt3-patser+ #39
>> [   37.456693] Call Trace:
>> [   37.456697]  [<ffffffff81607a78>] spin_bug+0xa0/0xa8
>> [   37.456699]  [<ffffffff8132b412>] do_raw_spin_lock+0xa2/0x170
>> [   37.456702]  [<ffffffff8104a201>] ? get_parent_ip+0x11/0x50
>> [   37.456704]  [<ffffffff8160d783>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0x30
>> [   37.456706]  [<ffffffff810931ce>] rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock+0x2e/0xd0
>> [   37.456708]  [<ffffffff8109093a>] futex_requeue+0x47a/0x850
>> [   37.456710]  [<ffffffff8109138e>] do_futex+0xae/0xb00
>> [   37.456712]  [<ffffffff81157dcd>] ? fget_light+0x6d/0x110
>> [   37.456714]  [<ffffffff810b77b7>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x2e7/0x310
>> [   37.456715]  [<ffffffff814c9375>] ? sys_recvmsg+0x75/0x90
>> [   37.456717]  [<ffffffff810923e6>] compat_sys_futex+0xf6/0x190
>> [   37.456719]  [<ffffffff8100e864>] ? syscall_trace_enter+0x184/0x210
>> [   37.456721]  [<ffffffff816158b3>] ia32_do_call+0x13/0x13
> 
> Urrgh, that's not a good one. Darren, can you please have a look at that?
> 

Will do.

Maarten, what are you running when you hit this?
rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() is only called by the requeue_pi code and
there is no libc support for that yet, so I'm surprised to see that in
the stack trace (unless you're running my futextest suite).

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ