[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLHgtmv2muHTUqyXv_4a0Pt27vgR1D-UtwBz6n7yUa6--w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 10:39:45 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
Hi Avi,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>> Are you talking about Documentation/lguest/lguest.c? How would you
>> suggest we unify our code with that?
>
> It should be easy to have tools/kvm drive lguest - they're both virtio
> based. All you need to do is provide yet another ops structure to drive the
> two ABIs.
Right, we could do that. But for what purpose? I thought Lguest ABI
was mostly for educational and testing purposes.
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 10:36 AM, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> I guess lguest.c has to remain, as point of lguest was a simple teaching aid
> for virtualization (which doesn't work very well, as the techniques it uses
> are obsolete).
Yup, I don't see point in merging lguest.c with tools/kvm.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists