[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLFv74GaBpNkVSWpEpqs505smUb2yBrMAh7UY_ggVWPwFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 11:23:43 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi@...hat.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, gorcunov@...il.com, levinsasha928@...il.com,
asias.hejun@...il.com, prasadjoshi124@...il.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Native Linux KVM tool for 3.1
Hi Alexander,
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de> wrote:
>> Same here - in fact i first asked Qemu to be put into tools/qemu/ so
>> that it all becomes more hackable and more usable - that suggestion
>> was rebuked very strongly.
>
> So instead of thinking a bit and trying to realize that there might be a reason people don't want all their user space in the kernel tree you go ahead and start your own crusade of creating a new user space. Great. That's how I always hoped Linux would be :(.
Damn you Ingo Molnar, I knew you'd somehow get all the credit for our
hard work! ;-)
More seriously, though, I fail to see what's bothering you Alexander.
I and Ingo already mentioned we wouldn't be hacking on Qemu even if
there wasn't no tools/kvm. It's not as if we're putting *your* user
space code into the kernel tree - we wrote our own! What's wrong with
that?
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists