linux-kernel - Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:25:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
cc:	Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt3

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 08:12:09PM -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > On 07/24/11 03:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > Dear RT Folks,
> > > 
> > > I'm pleased to announce the 3.0-rt3 release.
> > 
> > ARM panda board boots for PREEMPT_RT_FULL, with a BUG:
> > 
> > Freeing init memory: 308K
> > BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:645
> > in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 0, name: swapper
> > 1 lock held by swapper/0:
> >  #0:  (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.....}, at: [<c00ed470>] handle_fasteoi_irq+0x14/0x10c
> > irq event stamp: 21292
> > hardirqs last  enabled at (21291): [<c0061ee0>] default_idle+0x2c/0x3c
> > hardirqs last disabled at (21292): [<c0484bb4>] __irq_svc+0x34/0x138
> > softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<  (null)>]   (null)
> > softirqs last disabled at (0): [<  (null)>]   (null)
> > [<c00681b8>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xf0) from [<c0483d20>] (rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x5c)
> > [<c0483d20>] (rt_spin_lock+0x24/0x5c) from [<c006df74>] (gic_mask_irq+0x28/0x7c)
> > [<c006df74>] (gic_mask_irq+0x28/0x7c) from [<c00ece20>] (mask_irq+0x1c/0x2c)
> > [<c00ece20>] (mask_irq+0x1c/0x2c) from [<c00ed514>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb8/0x10c)
> > [<c00ed514>] (handle_fasteoi_irq+0xb8/0x10c) from [<c00ea724>] (generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50)
> > [<c00ea724>] (generic_handle_irq+0x34/0x50) from [<c0055048>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x48/0xa8)
> > [<c0055048>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x48/0xa8) from [<c0484bd0>] (__irq_svc+0x50/0x138)
> I guess you need something like the patch below.

Yep. Will add it to the other pile of ARM lock conversions.
 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index 4ddd0a6..5c1dd07 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
>  #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
>  #include <asm/hardware/gic.h>
>  
> -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
> +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(irq_controller_lock);
>  
>  /* Address of GIC 0 CPU interface */
>  void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr __read_mostly;
> @@ -88,30 +88,30 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
>  	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_mask)
>  		gic_arch_extn.irq_mask(d);
> -	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
>  		gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask(d);
>  	writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
> -	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void gic_eoi_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>  {
>  	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi) {
> -		spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +		raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  		gic_arch_extn.irq_eoi(d);
> -		spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +		raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	}
>  
>  	writel_relaxed(gic_irq(d), gic_cpu_base(d) + GIC_CPU_EOI);
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>  	if (type != IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH && type != IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
>  	if (gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type)
>  		gic_arch_extn.irq_set_type(d, type);
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static int gic_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
>  	if (enabled)
>  		writel_relaxed(enablemask, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_SET + enableoff);
>  
> -	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -188,11 +188,11 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
>  	mask = 0xff << shift;
>  	bit = 1 << (cpu + shift);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	d->node = cpu;
>  	val = readl_relaxed(reg) & ~mask;
>  	writel_relaxed(val | bit, reg);
> -	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -222,9 +222,9 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
>  
>  	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
>  
> -	spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  	status = readl_relaxed(chip_data->cpu_base + GIC_CPU_INTACK);
> -	spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&irq_controller_lock);
>  
>  	gic_irq = (status & 0x3ff);
>  	if (gic_irq == 1023)
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>