linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix build breakage in xfs_iops.c when CONFIG_FS_POSIX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110726094901.GA18893@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 05:49:01 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Steven Liu <lingjiujianke@...il.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: Fix build breakage in xfs_iops.c when
 CONFIG_FS_POSIX_ACL is not set

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:47:28AM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
> No, "# CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING is not set". 
> I've tested this patch with gcc 4.5.2, 4.6.1 and 4.7.0 and in all cases
> the kernel builds just fine.

In that case we might as well just throw it in and try it.  In the worst
case we'll get one expansion per site that takes the address, but no-acl
builds aren't really something worth optimizing for.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/