[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpUEfYrrtpcRLTekSHMHrTTka6ir=z_GUUbnxuQKfY+OXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 21:01:50 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, lacombar@...il.com, sam@...nborg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN()
and KCONFIG_MODULE()
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz> wrote:
> Replace the config_is_*() macros with a variant that allows for grepping
> for usage of CONFIG_* options in the code. Usage:
>
> if (KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA))
>
> or
>
> #if KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA)
>
> The KCONFIG() macro evaluates to 1 if the argument is set (to either 'y'
> or 'm'), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE() test if the respective
> option is 'y' and 'm', respectively.
I think it's better to let KCONFIG_MODULE() returns true only for =m, so that
KCONFIG() will equal to KCONFIG_BUILTIN() || KCONFIG_MODULE().
BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists