[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABE8wwsZe+MMVPXDrNsT8ORM+n29x--1+4+qTCyct7BWAgSpgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 09:15:56 -0700
From: "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Roland Dreier <roland@...estorage.com>
Subject: Re: Preempt & smp_processor_id in __make_request
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:56 AM, Sergey Senozhatsky
<sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> On (07/26/11 10:32), Steven Whitehouse wrote:
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00
>> 000000] code: jbd2/dm-0-8/1546
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: caller is __make_request+0x209/0x350
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: Pid: 1546, comm: jbd2/dm-0-8 Tainted: G W
>> 3.0.0+ #252
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: Call Trace:
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff813db897>] debug_smp_processor_id+0xe7
>> /0x100
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff813b6f29>] __make_request+0x209/0x350
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff8154635e>] ? dm_request+0x2e/0x280
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff813b3ffb>] generic_make_request+0x27b/
>> 0x550
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff8123ef7e>] ? jbd2_journal_file_buffer+
>> 0x8e/0x130
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff813b432f>] submit_bio+0x5f/0xd0
>> Jul 26 09:54:04 chywoon kernel: [<ffffffff811b14a6>] submit_bh+0xe6/0x120
>> etc.
>>
>> The (trivial) fix appears to be the following:
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
>> index f8cb099..f925581 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-core.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
>> @@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ get_rq:
>>
>> if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) ||
>> bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CPU_AFFINE))
>> - req->cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + req->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>>
>> plug = current->plug;
>> if (plug) {
>>
>> However this fixes the symptoms, rather than the cause, so I'm not at
>> all sure that this is the correct solution,
I did not realize smp_processor_id() enforced that restriction. It
seems like we want raw_smp_processor_id() since it is an affinity
hint, and not an affinity guarantee.
--
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists