[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7E17FF1-9EF5-46F5-8B3A-8F3050912000@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 19:38:10 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segooon@...il.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch v2] x86: kvm: x86: fix information leak to userland
On 26.07.2011, at 19:24, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/26/2011 08:05 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> struct kvm_pit_state2 {
>> struct kvm_pit_channel_state channels[3];
>> __u32 flags;
>> __u32 reserved[9];
>> };
>>
>> So memset(&ps->reserved) would give you the a __u32 **, no? Same goes for all the other array sets in here. Or am I understanding some C logic wrong? :)
>>
>
> An address of an array is the array itself.
Ah, nice. So it's really a matter of taste then rather than functionality. Good to know :)
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists