[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <36863.1311703682@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:08:02 -0400
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Doron Cohen <doronc@...no-ms.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: [PATCH] drivers: support new Siano tuner devices.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 10:39:00 +0300, Doron Cohen said:
> I guess the right thing is to have the copyrights to Siano since legally
> - we are all signed on a contract which specifies all our code as
> company property.
> But if changing the copyright is an issue - we will leave it unchanged.
In that case, a patch that did the following:
1) Mentioned the contract status of the code in the changelog section
2) Looked like this:
-Copyright (C) 2006-2008, Uri Shkolnik, Anatoly Greenblat
+Copyright (C) 2006-2011 Siano Mobile, Inc. (or whatever the company's legal name is)
would be fine, I think. There's no issue with fixing the copyright statement - my
comment was that *the particular change* in the patch looked odd.
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists