linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(), KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110726112824.b357c756.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:28:24 -0700
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Cc:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, lacombar@...il.com, sam@...nborg.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, plagnioj@...osoft.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] kconfig: Introduce KCONFIG(),
 KCONFIG_BUILTIN() and KCONFIG_MODULE()

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:28:05 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:

> Dne 26.7.2011 17:04, Randy Dunlap napsal(a):
> > On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:21:39 +0200 Michal Marek wrote:
> >> On 26.7.2011 15:01, Américo Wang wrote:
> >>> BTW, the name KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA) seems ugly.
> >>
> >> Suggest a better one :). The proposals so far:
> >> config_is_numa() (breaks grep)
> > 
> > explain, please.
> 
> If you grep for CONFIG_FOO usage, you'll miss this alternate syntax.
> 

Ack.

> 
> >> CONFIGURED(CONFIG_NUMA)
> >> ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)
> >> KCONFIG(CONFIG_NUMA)
> > 
> > CONFIG(NUMA) || CONFIG(NUMA_BUILTIN) || CONFIG(NUMA_MODULE)
> 
> same problem.

Yes, I sorta got that after I sent the email.

I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then.

---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/